🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."